Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=945204
 
 

Footnotes (155)



 


 



Original Intent in the First Congress


Louis J. Sirico Jr.


Villanova University School of Law


Missouri Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 3, Summer 2006
Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 2006-24

Abstract:     
Most of the literature on this country's Founding Era concludes that at least in the very early years, the Founders did not look to original intent to construe the Constitution. However, this study looks not at what the Founders said they believed, but how they acted. In the First Federal Congress, the members did use arguments based on original intent. This study identifies their originalist arguments and categorizes them into five rhetorical categories. It concludes that these arguments did not dominate the debates, but were one type of argument among many.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: constitutional law, legal history, First Congress, Original Intent

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 17, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Sirico, Louis J., Original Intent in the First Congress. Missouri Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 3, Summer 2006; Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 2006-24. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=945204

Contact Information

Louis J. Sirico Jr. (Contact Author)
Villanova University School of Law ( email )
299 N. Spring Mill Road
Villanova, PA 19085
United States
610-519 7071 (Phone)
610-519 6282 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 788
Downloads: 167
Download Rank: 104,469
Footnotes:  155

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.453 seconds