Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=948229
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (235)



 


 



Copyright and Public Good Economics: A Misunderstood Relation


Christopher S. Yoo


University of Pennsylvania Law School; University of Pennsylvania - Annenberg School for Communication; University of Pennsylvania - School of Engineering and Applied Science


University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 155, 2007
Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 06-22
Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 06-22

Abstract:     
The conventional approach to analyzing the economics of copyright is based on the premise that copyrightable works constitute pure public goods, which is generally modeled by assuming that such works are non-excludable and that the marginal cost of making additional copies of them is essentially zero. These assumptions in turn imply that markets systematically produce too few copyrightable works and underutilize those that are produced. Moreover, any attempt to alleviate the problems of underproduction necessarily exacerbates the problems of underutilization and vice versa. In this Article, Professor Christopher Yoo argues that the conventional approach is based on a fundamental misunderstanding. A close examination of the foundations of public good economics reveals that the defining characteristic of public goods is the need to satisfy an optimality criterion known as the "Samuelson condition," which gives rise to a source of market failure that is distinct from the problems posed by non-excludability and zero marginal costs. Reframing the analysis in terms of the Samuelson condition also expands the number of ways in which the assumptions underlying pure public goods can be relaxed. In so doing, it suggests that markets for copyrighted works are more properly analyzed as impure public goods. Unlike markets for pure public goods, markets for impure public goods exhibit no systematic bias toward underproduction and are not bounded away from providing efficient levels of utilization. The insights of impure public goods theory thus have broad implications for a wide range of copyright-related issues, including fair use, duration, compulsory licenses, database protection, digital rights management, and derivative works.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 82

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 30, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Yoo, Christopher S., Copyright and Public Good Economics: A Misunderstood Relation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 155, 2007; Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 06-22; Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 06-22. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=948229

Contact Information

Christopher S. Yoo (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204
United States
(215) 746-8772 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.upenn.edu/faculty/csyoo/
University of Pennsylvania - Annenberg School for Communication ( email )
3620 Walnut St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6220
United States
(215) 746-8772 (Phone)
University of Pennsylvania - School of Engineering and Applied Science ( email )
3330 Walnut St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6309
United States
(215) 746-8772 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,994
Downloads: 451
Download Rank: 34,675
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  235

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.203 seconds