Abstract

 


 



The Rise and Fall of Natrecor for Congestive Heart Failure: Implications for Drug Policy


Aaron S. Kesselheim


Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School; Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics


Health Affairs, Vol. 25, pp. 1095-1102, 2006

Abstract:     
Recent revelations of unexpected side effects of widely prescribed medications have raised questions about several aspects of U.S. drug policy, from initial FDA approval to promotion by manufacturers and subsequent prescribing by physicians. One prominent example is nesiritide (Natrecor), a new treatment for congestive heart failure. We use nesiritide as a case study to assess how FDA standards for drug approval, marketing practices by drug manufacturers, and physician prescribing choices can shape the risk-benefit relationship of new drugs. Based on the nesiritide experience, we suggest several policy changes to improve policies for drug approval, post-marketing surveillance process, and drug utilization.

Keywords: FDA, Drug policy, Post-marketing surveillance

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: December 4, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Kesselheim, Aaron S., The Rise and Fall of Natrecor for Congestive Heart Failure: Implications for Drug Policy. Health Affairs, Vol. 25, pp. 1095-1102, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=948969

Contact Information

Aaron S. Kesselheim (Contact Author)
Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School ( email )
1620 Tremont St
Suite 3030
Boston, MA 02120
United States
617-278-0930 (Phone)
617-232-8602 (Fax)
Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics ( email )
124 Mount Auburn Street
Suite 520N
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 308

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.312 seconds