Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=949199
 
 

Citations (5)



 
 

Footnotes (365)



 


 



Morality and Antitrust


Maurice E. Stucke


University of Tennessee College of Law


Columbia Business Law Review, Vol. 2006, p. 443, 2006

Abstract:     
Although the Sherman Act was enacted over a century ago, antitrust enforcers, policy makers, and scholars have largely circumvented the morality of antitrust crimes. Its absence is remarkable given the vigorous debate over the appropriate civil and criminal penalties for antitrust violations. Under the continued influence of the Chicago-school's neoclassical economic theories, antitrust analysis is primarily concerned with economic efficiency. Since terms like morality and evil are judgmental, not descriptive, they are deemed outside the discourse of economic theory's self-described positivism. But antitrust analysis is not beyond the judgmental. Over the past thirty years, while antitrust's civil remedies have remained relatively unchanged, the criminal penalties for price fixing, bid rigging, and other Sherman Act antitrust violations have soared - from a misdemeanor to a felony punishable by up to ten years imprisonment. If the criminal laws reflect society's moral judgments, then antitrust and morality ultimately are intertwined. This article provides a background of antitrust violations and the flawed economic theory of optimal deterrence that has played a critical role in shaping the criminal sanctions for Sherman Act violations. Despite the escalation in antitrust's criminal penalties, there is no clear evidence that optimal deterrence has been achieved. The article next introduces morality and asks what role morality could play in the field of antitrust, if optimal deterrence alone is insufficient to effectively deter violations. After examining under a three-part standard whether antitrust crimes can indeed be deemed immoral, the article weighs some of the benefits and risks of supplementing antitrust crimes with a moral component and the risks of the current course - namely, ignoring morality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 105

Keywords: Antitrust, Law and Economics, Ethics, Behavioral Law and Economics, Criminal Law

JEL Classification: L40, L41, K42, K21, K14

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 6, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Stucke, Maurice E., Morality and Antitrust. Columbia Business Law Review, Vol. 2006, p. 443, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=949199

Contact Information

Maurice E. Stucke (Contact Author)
University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )
1505 W. Cumberland Ave.
Knoxville, TN 37996
United States
865-974-9816 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.utk.edu/people/maurice-e-stucke/

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,197
Downloads: 539
Download Rank: 28,667
Citations:  5
Footnotes:  365

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.297 seconds