|
||||
|
||||
Why the Plain View Doctrine Should Not Apply to Digital Evidence
RayMing Chang George Washington University Law School Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy, Vol. 12, pp. 31-67, Spring 2007 Abstract: This paper argues that the plain view doctrine, an exception to the Fourth Amendment, should not apply to digital evidence. Searches pursuant to warrants for digital property are easily transformed into general searches of a suspect's digital property because police, by necessity, must perform a comprehensive search of a suspect's digital property in order to properly execute a digital property warrant. Courts have already begun to apply the plain view doctrine in a manner that allows police to use anything found during a search of digital property (e.g., computers) as evidence of crimes beyond the scope of the warrant. General searches are proscribed by the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, courts should stop applying the plain view doctrine to digital evidence.
Keywords: Plain View Doctrine, Plain View, Fourth Amendment, Search, Seizure, Evidence, Digital Property, Digital Evidence, General Searches, General Warrants JEL Classifications: K14, K49 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: December 06, 2006 ; Last revised: May 29, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.078 seconds.