References (52)



Colonialism and Industrialization: A Critique of Lewis

M. Shahid Alam

Northeastern University

May 1, 2004

Review of Radical Political Economics, pp. 217-240, Spring 2004

This paper presents a critique of W. Arthur Lewis' economic explanation of the division of the world into industrial and agricultural countries. First, Lewis' claim that industrialization in the tropics was held back by small markets and adverse factoral terms of trade is flawed in its logic, and lacks empirical support as well. Second, his rejection of the imperialist origins of poverty is poorly argued, and his claim that colonial policies did not differ from policies of sovereign countries is not supported even by his own evidence. He also ignores the strong correlation between loss of sovereignty and poor growth performance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Industrialization, Industry, Manufacturing, Manufactures, Colonialism, Imperialism, Economic growth, Market size, Terms of Trade, Economic backwardness, Arthur Lewis, W. A. Lewis

JEL Classification: N10, O14, O50

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 11, 2006 ; Last revised: March 10, 2013

Suggested Citation

Alam, M. Shahid, Colonialism and Industrialization: A Critique of Lewis (May 1, 2004). Review of Radical Political Economics, pp. 217-240, Spring 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=950615

Contact Information

Mohammad Shahid Alam (Contact Author)
Northeastern University ( email )
Boston, MA 02115
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,364
Downloads: 222
Download Rank: 102,956
References:  52

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.204 seconds