Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=950757
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (116)



 


 



Compelling Interest, Forbidden Aim: The Antinomy of Grutter and Gratz


Patrick S. Shin


Suffolk University Law School


University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, Vol. 82, p. 432, 2005

Abstract:     
This article explores the tension between the Grutter Court's capacious account of the value of racial diversity, on the one hand, and the Gratz Court's insistence on the constraining mechanism of individualized consideration, on the other. The article examines whether the promotion of diversity as a compelling interest can be reconciled with the requirement of individualized consideration under any coherent principle of equal treatment. The article concludes that the only way this can be done is to interpret the cases as rejecting the proposition that 'racial' diversity represents a compelling governmental interest and as implicitly adopting, instead, the idea that race is at most an information-bearing proxy for diversity conceived in terms of some race-blind modality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: Grutter, Gratz, individualized consideration, equal treatment, diversity, affirmative action

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 12, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Shin, Patrick S., Compelling Interest, Forbidden Aim: The Antinomy of Grutter and Gratz. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, Vol. 82, p. 432, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=950757

Contact Information

Patrick S. Shin (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States
617-573-8182 (Phone)
617-305-3090 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 726
Downloads: 47
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  116

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.265 seconds