Footnotes (50)



International Decision, Prosecutor v. Karemera et al. (ICTR)

Kevin Jon Heller

SOAS, University of London

American Journal of International Law, Vol. 101, 2006

The Appeals Chamber of the ICTR recently held in Prosecutor v. Karemera et al. that the existence of a nationwide campaign of genocide in Rwanda in 1994 is a fact of common knowledge of which Trial Chambers must take judicial notice. This short essay, which is forthcoming in the International Decision section of the American Journal of International Law, critiques that decision from an evidentiary perspective. It begins by arguing that the nationwide campaign is logically irrelevant to the responsibility of a defendant for particular genocidal acts, because proof of the campaign is not a formal element of genocide and viewing the campaign as context for a genocide charge does not make it more likely that the defendant is guilty. It then argues that even if proof of the nationwide campaign does have some probative value, the possibility that a Trial Chamber will infer the defendant's specific intent to commit genocide from that campaign - even in the absence of any other evidence - is so prejudicial that exclusion is still warranted.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: ICTR, Appeals Chamber, Trial Chamber, genocide, specific intent, proof of intent, judicial notice, international criminal law

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: December 15, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Heller, Kevin Jon, International Decision, Prosecutor v. Karemera et al. (ICTR). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=951847

Contact Information

Kevin Jon Heller (Contact Author)
SOAS, University of London ( email )
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,758
Downloads: 246
Download Rank: 73,778
Footnotes:  50

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.328 seconds