International Decision, Prosecutor v. Karemera et al. (ICTR)
Kevin Jon Heller
University of London - School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS)
American Journal of International Law, Vol. 101, 2006
The Appeals Chamber of the ICTR recently held in Prosecutor v. Karemera et al. that the existence of a nationwide campaign of genocide in Rwanda in 1994 is a fact of common knowledge of which Trial Chambers must take judicial notice. This short essay, which is forthcoming in the International Decision section of the American Journal of International Law, critiques that decision from an evidentiary perspective. It begins by arguing that the nationwide campaign is logically irrelevant to the responsibility of a defendant for particular genocidal acts, because proof of the campaign is not a formal element of genocide and viewing the campaign as context for a genocide charge does not make it more likely that the defendant is guilty. It then argues that even if proof of the nationwide campaign does have some probative value, the possibility that a Trial Chamber will infer the defendant's specific intent to commit genocide from that campaign - even in the absence of any other evidence - is so prejudicial that exclusion is still warranted.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13
Keywords: ICTR, Appeals Chamber, Trial Chamber, genocide, specific intent, proof of intent, judicial notice, international criminal lawAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 15, 2006
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.312 seconds