Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=951934
 
 

Footnotes (268)



 


 



Defensive Warfare, Prevention and Hegemony: The Justifications for the Franco-Spanish War of 1635


Randall Lesaffer


Tilburg Law School; KU Leuven - Faculty of Law


Journal of the History of International Law, Vol. 8, pp. 1-2, 2006

Abstract:     
On 19 May 1635, a French herald formally declared war upon Spain at Brussels, the capital of the Spanish Netherlands. The ensuing war lasted 24 years and changed the balance of power in Europe, opening the way for France's bid for European hegemony under Louis XIV in the second half of the 17th century.

In this article, the official justifications for war advanced by the two great belligerent powers are analyzed. The paper uses the analysis of this material to establish contemporary understandings of what the law of nations said about the ius ad bellum (here meaning the body of law that regulates the right to wage war). This sheds some light on the justice or legality of the two belligerents' positions in terms of the then existing ius ad bellum, although no attempt is made to reach a conclusion on this.

In their official declarations and justifications of war, the two belligerents each distinguished between the legality (under the positive law of nations) and the justice (under natural law) of the war. Each party provided succinct arguments under positive law against the disputed the legality of their opponent's actions. But their main emphasis was the justice of their own causes and war goals. These arguments centered on their own interpretations of classical just war doctrine. Whereas jurists and scholars in general tended to concentrate on just cause, the authors of the declarations and justifications of 1635 focused on the justice of their goals and the necessity of the war to attain these goals. Thus they did not offer judgments on the offensive or defensive character of the war at the military-operational level, but rather at the political-strategic level. This allowed both parties to characterize their resort to war as defensive. Each justified the war as being necessary to defend its position as a great power and to uphold the ordering of Christian Europe. Each thus identified the common interest of all princes and republics with either its own hegemonic position (in the case of Spain) or its supposedly rightful ambitions (in the case of France).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 114

Keywords: history, international law, laws of war

JEL Classification: K33

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 17, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Lesaffer, Randall, Defensive Warfare, Prevention and Hegemony: The Justifications for the Franco-Spanish War of 1635. Journal of the History of International Law, Vol. 8, pp. 1-2, 2006 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=951934

Contact Information

Randall C. H. Lesaffer (Contact Author)
Tilburg Law School ( email )
PO Box 90153
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands
0031 13 4662294 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://rechten.uvt.nl/lesaffer
KU Leuven - Faculty of Law
Tiensestraat 41
Leuven, B-3000
Belgium
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,159
Downloads: 254
Download Rank: 68,743
Footnotes:  268

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.312 seconds