Abstract

 
 

References (83)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



The Return of the Size Anomaly: Evidence from the German Stock Market


Amir Amel-Zadeh


University of Cambridge - Judge Business School

December 30, 2008

University of Cambridge, Judge Business School Working Paper No. 23/2006

Abstract:     
This paper examines the size-effect in the German stock market and intends to address several unanswered issues on this widely known anomaly. Unlike recent evidence of a reversal of the size anomaly we document a conditional relation between size and returns. We also detect strong momentum across size portfolios. Our results indicate that the marginal effect of firm size on stock returns is conditional on the firm’s past performance. We use an instrumental variable estimation to address Berk’s critique of a simultaneity bias in prior studies on the small firm effect and to investigate the economic rationale behind firm size as an explanatory variable for the variation in stock returns. The analysis in this paper indicates that firm size captures firm characteristic components in stock returns and that this regularity cannot be explained by differences in systematic risk.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 70

Keywords: Size-effect, capital market anomaly, CAPM, efficient markets, momentum

JEL Classification: G12, G14, C21, C31

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 16, 2007 ; Last revised: July 5, 2009

Suggested Citation

Amel-Zadeh, Amir, The Return of the Size Anomaly: Evidence from the German Stock Market (December 30, 2008). University of Cambridge, Judge Business School Working Paper No. 23/2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=952472 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.952472

Contact Information

Amir Amel-Zadeh (Contact Author)
University of Cambridge - Judge Business School ( email )
Trumpington Street
Cambridge, CB2 1AG
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,837
Downloads: 1,710
Download Rank: 3,689
References:  83
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 4.094 seconds