|
||||
|
||||
The Current State of Bullet-Lead Evidence
David H. Kaye The Pennsylvania State University Dickinson School of Law Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and Technology, Vol. 46, pp. 99-114, 2006 Abstract: This article describes recent opinions on the admissibility of bullet-lead evidence. In 2004, the National Research Council released a report identifying certain problems with this type of evidence and making recommendations for improvements in the analytical procedure, the interpretation of a match among bullet fragments, and the presentation of the laboratory findings in court. In response, the FBI has stopped performing the procedure, and it appears that in any retrials involving previous testimony, the courts will view the past testimony of FBI examiners more skeptically. Even if the testimony were as circumspect as called for in the NRC report, however, it might not have sufficient value to the jury to warrant its admission.
Keywords: scientific evidence, Daubert, bullet-lead, likelihood ratio, probative value Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: December 21, 2006 ; Last revised: January 08, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.094 seconds.