|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id1728343. ; Size: 240K
|
|
Do Investment Banks Matter for M&A Returns?
Jack Bao Ohio State University (OSU) - Department of Finance
Alex Edmans University of Pennsylvania - Finance Department; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
December 20, 2010
Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 2286-2315, July 2011 EFA 2007 Ljubljana Meetings Paper
Abstract:
We document a significant investment bank fixed effect in the announcement returns of an M&A deal. The inter-quartile range of bank fixed effects is 1.26%, compared to a full-sample average return of 0.72%. The results remain significant after controlling for the component of returns attributable to the acquirer. Our findings suggest that investment banks matter for M&A outcomes, and contrast earlier studies which show no positive link between various measures of advisor quality and M&A returns. Differences in average returns across banks are also persistent over time and predictable from prior performance. Clients do not chase past returns, which may explain why persistence exists in M&A performance while it is absent in mutual funds.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41
Keywords: Investment Banking, Persistence, Mergers & Acquisitions
JEL Classification: G24, G34
Accepted Paper Series
Download This Paper
Date posted: December 21, 2006
; Last revised: December 7, 2011
Suggested CitationBao, Jack and Edmans, Alex, Do Investment Banks Matter for M&A Returns? (December 20, 2010). Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 2286-2315, July 2011; EFA 2007 Ljubljana Meetings Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=952935
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1.
Endogeneity in Empirical Corporate Finance
By
Michael Roberts
and
Toni Whited
2.
Implications of Data Screens on Merger and Acquisition Analysis: A Large Sample Study of Mergers and Acquisitions from 1992-2009
By
Jeffry Netter,
Mike Stegemoller, ...
3.
When It Pays to Pay Your Investment Banker: New Evidence on the Role of Financial Advisors in M&As
By
Andrey Golubov,
Dimitris Petmezas, ...
4.
A Review of Empirical Capital Structure Research and Directions for the Future
By
John Graham
and
Mark Leary
5.
The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation
By
Kenneth Ahern
and
Amy Dittmar
6.
A Century of Corporate Takeovers: What Have We Learned and Where Do We Stand? (previous title: The History of M&A Activity Around the World: A Survey of Literature)
By
Marina Martynova
and
Luc Renneboog
7.
A Critique of Recent Quantitative and Deep-Structure Modeling in Capital Structure Research and Beyond
By
Ivo Welch
8.
Applied Mergers and Acquisitions
By
Robert Bruner
9.
Are US CEOs Paid More? New International Evidence
By
Nuno Fernandes,
Miguel Ferreira, ...
10.
Creditor Control Rights, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value
By
Greg Nini,
Amir Sufi, ...
|
|
|
|