Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=953121
 
 

Footnotes (158)



 


 



William Rehnquist, the Separation of Powers, and the Riddle of the Sphinx


Jay Bybee


U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; William S. Boyd School of Law, UNLV

Tuan Samahon


Villanova University - School of Law


Stanford Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 6, p. 1735
UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-08

Abstract:     
From his service as the head of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel through his tenure as an Associate and Chief Justice on the Supreme Court, Rehnquist's separation of powers jurisprudence has been marked by an inductive, common-law approach to constitutional adjudication. It is an approach that eschews categorical, a priori bright-line rules, but favors precedent and the lessons of history, and occasionally learned from history to permit a line of authority, in a common law evolutionary manner, to be rationalized or become extinct. When Rehnquist believed the constitutional text spoke clearly, he followed its specific commands. Absent such clarity, though, he would defer to Congress as "the dominant balancer of public policy in our democratic society." That is not to say that with respect to the separation of powers Rehnquist was pro-Congress simpliciter. Instead, when Congress failed to take responsibility for its duty to make public policy, Rehnquist enforced the separation of powers by forcing Congress to deliberate and not impermissibly pass the buck to the executive branch or to the courts. These themes provide some unity to Rehnquist's separation of powers cases and explain some of his votes.

Of course, Rehnquist's views on the separation of powers might not be so tidily explained and we briefly explore an alternative account of Rehnquist's separation of powers cases, namely, that there were two William Rehnquists with regard to the separation of powers. The first was the Associate Justice and dissenting "Lone Ranger" who took a strong view of the separation of power. The second was the Chief Justice, with an institutional incentive to vote with the majority, who would assume a less formal approach to the issue.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: separation of powers, William Rehnquist, Morrison v. Olson, Office of Legal Counsel

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 23, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Bybee, Jay and Samahon, Tuan, William Rehnquist, the Separation of Powers, and the Riddle of the Sphinx. Stanford Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 6, p. 1735; UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=953121

Contact Information

Jay Bybee
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States
William S. Boyd School of Law, UNLV
4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States
Tuan Samahon (Contact Author)
Villanova University - School of Law ( email )
299 N. Spring Mill Road
Villanova, PA 19085
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,732
Downloads: 106
Download Rank: 150,461
Footnotes:  158

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds