Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=954029
 
 

Footnotes (190)



 


 



The Wolves and the Sheep of Constitutional Law: A Review Essay on Kermit Roosevelt's - the Myth of Judicial Activism


Timothy Sandefur


Pacific Legal Foundation

December 28, 2006

Program for Judicial Awareness Working Paper No. 06-004

Abstract:     
The debate over judicial activism is nothing new, but recent years have seen the debate becoming increasingly bitter. In The Myth of Judicial Activism, Professor Kermit Roosevelt tries to provide a more levelheaded assessment of the judiciary's role. But his approach - which largely adopts the consensus of the legal establishment - suffers from a fundamental flaw: like Judge Robert Bork and Justice Steven Breyer before him, Roosevelt centers his jurisprudence around preserving democratic decisionmaking, rather than protecting liberty. This basic error renders this approach incompatible with the constitutional design, and distracts all of these thinkers from the more fundamental philosophical issues that lie at the heart of the judicial activism debate. This article uses Roosevelt's book as a point of departure for a more general discussion over the judiciary's role in preserving the fundamental constitutional value of liberty, and explains why focusing on democracy rather than liberty leads to erroneous conclusions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: judiciary, judicial acivism, constitution, jurisprudence

JEL Classification: K10, K40

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 29, 2006 ; Last revised: March 5, 2008

Suggested Citation

Sandefur, Timothy, The Wolves and the Sheep of Constitutional Law: A Review Essay on Kermit Roosevelt's - the Myth of Judicial Activism (December 28, 2006). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=954029 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.954029

Contact Information

Timothy Sandefur (Contact Author)
Pacific Legal Foundation ( email )
930 G Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,668
Downloads: 269
Download Rank: 65,765
Footnotes:  190

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds