|
||||
|
||||
When is Market Incompleteness Irrelevant for the Price of Aggregate Risk (and When is it Not)?Dirk KruegerUniversity of Pennsylvania - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Hanno N. LustigUCLA - Anderson School of Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) November 18, 2007 Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 145, No. 1, 2010 Abstract: In a standard incomplete markets model with a continuum of households that have constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) preferences, the absence of insurance markets for idiosyncratic labor income risk has no effect on the premium for aggregate risk if the distribution of idiosyncratic risk is independent of aggregate shocks and aggregate consumption growth is independent over time. In equilibrium, households only use the stock market to smooth consumption; the bond market is inoperative. Furthermore, the cross-sectional distributions of wealth and consumption are not affected by aggregate shocks. These results hold regardless of the persistence of idiosyncratic shocks, even when households face tight solvency constraints. A weaker irrelevance result survives when we allow for predictability in aggregate consumption growth.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50 Keywords: Market Incompleteness, Asset Pricing JEL Classification: G12 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 1, 2007 ; Last revised: August 27, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.343 seconds