The Merciful State
Linda Ross Meyer
Quinnipiac University School of Law
January 30, 2012
FORGIVENESS, MERCY AND CLEMENCY, Austin Sarat & Nasser Hussain, eds., Stanford University Press, 2007
This article challenges the view, most recently articulated by Dan Markel, that merciful mitigation of punishment by state actors is contrary to principles of retributivism, equality, and democracy. In addition to providing a theoretical response to these arguments, the article points out that our justice system is (and should be) riddled with mercy, and when mercy is given out of equity, relationships of allegiance, peace-making, or compassion, it may ground and confirm responsibility and community - not undermine them. Concluding that a theoretical challenge to mercy fails, the article examines many instances of clemency and pardon to begin a more contextual, case-based look at when mercy is appropriate and when it is not.
Keywords: mercy, grace, pardon, capital punishment, forgiveness, apology, clemency, mitigation, sympathy, compassion, retribution, punishment, Heidegger, Kant, allegiance, grace, equity
JEL Classification: K14Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 22, 2007 ; Last revised: October 19, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.454 seconds