The Peculiar Federal Marriage Amendment

Scott Dodson

University of California Hastings College of the Law

Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 36, p. 783, 2004

In this essay, I discuss the Constitution's commitment to three themes - state power over familial matters, individual liberty, and equality - and then demonstrate how the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment is uniquely contrary to all three. I do not intend to go so far as to suggest that the FMA would be an unconstitutional amendment, if such things are possible, nor do I mean to suggest that same-sex marriage is or should be affirmatively protected by the Constitution. I mean only to suggest that proposed amendments altering the Constitution's commitment to multiple existing themes in the Constitution should be scrutinized warily for thematic coherence. Because the FMA is contrary to three existing constitutional themes while furthering no other, the FMA would be a decidedly peculiar appendage to our modern Constitution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: federal marriage amendment, marriage protection amendment, Lawrence, gay marriage, same-sex marriage, constitutional thematics

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 14, 2007 ; Last revised: November 12, 2012

Suggested Citation

Dodson, Scott, The Peculiar Federal Marriage Amendment. Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 36, p. 783, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=955872

Contact Information

Scott Dodson (Contact Author)
University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
415-581-8959 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://https://www.uchastings.edu/faculty-administration/faculty/dodson/index.html

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 604
Downloads: 42

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds