The Peculiar Federal Marriage Amendment
University of California Hastings College of the Law
Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 36, p. 783, 2004
In this essay, I discuss the Constitution's commitment to three themes - state power over familial matters, individual liberty, and equality - and then demonstrate how the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment is uniquely contrary to all three. I do not intend to go so far as to suggest that the FMA would be an unconstitutional amendment, if such things are possible, nor do I mean to suggest that same-sex marriage is or should be affirmatively protected by the Constitution. I mean only to suggest that proposed amendments altering the Constitution's commitment to multiple existing themes in the Constitution should be scrutinized warily for thematic coherence. Because the FMA is contrary to three existing constitutional themes while furthering no other, the FMA would be a decidedly peculiar appendage to our modern Constitution.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Keywords: federal marriage amendment, marriage protection amendment, Lawrence, gay marriage, same-sex marriage, constitutional thematicsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 14, 2007 ; Last revised: November 12, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds