The Angel is in the Big Picture: A Response to Lemley
University of Miami - School of Law; Charlotte School of Law
Michigan Law Review, Vol. 105, No. 7, pp. 1537-1544, May 2007
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 07-02
Under current law, independent invention is no defense to patent infringement. In another paper, the author proposes that independent invention be recognized as such a defense. Mark Lemley, in his Comment about that paper, expresses three reservations concerning the author's proposed reform and also suggests four alternative reforms that are less ambitious than the author's. The instant paper responds to Lemley's Comment, conceding that two of his reservations are more or less valid and that two of his alternative reforms are viable. More work is needed to determine whether either of these alternative reforms is superior to the author's proposed reform. Which reform is superior depends ultimately on the extent to which independent invention is a function of forces exogenous to the patent system.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11
Keywords: patent, invention, inventor, prior user, independent invention, patent infringement, independent inventor
JEL Classification: O31, O34Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 10, 2007
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.766 seconds