SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (6)

Beta

 


 



Is it Time to Wind Up the Securities Act of 1933?

James C. Spindler
University of Southern California Law School



Regulation, Vol 29, No.4, Winter 2006-2007 pp. 48-55

Abstract:     
The Securities Act of 1933 was once considered a great benefit for investors because of the strict liability it places on firms to truthfully disclose information to investors. But the strict liability provisions are now dissuading firms from communicating useful information for fear that it may inadvertently contain errors or inaccuracies. The resulting silence is no benefit to investors. Strict liability simply makes no sense in today's sophisticated and deep capital markets.

Keywords: securities act, mandatory disclosure rules, hidden costs, SEC, securities and exchange commission, liability, equity-based compensation, performance-based compensation, shareholders, public firms, investors, capital markets, james spindler

JEL Classifications: D40, D78, E62, G15, G18, G24, G28,

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: January 20, 2007 ; Last revised: August 30, 2008

Suggested Citation

Spindler, James C., Is it Time to Wind Up the Securities Act of 1933?. Regulation, Vol 29, No.4, Winter 2006-2007 pp. 48-55. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=956900


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

James C. Spindler (Contact Author)
University of Southern California Law School ( email )
699 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 231
Downloads: 40
References: 6

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo5b in 0.235 seconds.