|
||||
|
||||
Is it Time to Wind Up the Securities Act of 1933?
James C. Spindler University of Southern California Law School Regulation, Vol 29, No.4, Winter 2006-2007 pp. 48-55 Abstract: The Securities Act of 1933 was once considered a great benefit for investors because of the strict liability it places on firms to truthfully disclose information to investors. But the strict liability provisions are now dissuading firms from communicating useful information for fear that it may inadvertently contain errors or inaccuracies. The resulting silence is no benefit to investors. Strict liability simply makes no sense in today's sophisticated and deep capital markets.
Keywords: securities act, mandatory disclosure rules, hidden costs, SEC, securities and exchange commission, liability, equity-based compensation, performance-based compensation, shareholders, public firms, investors, capital markets, james spindler JEL Classifications: D40, D78, E62, G15, G18, G24, G28, Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 20, 2007 ; Last revised: August 30, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo5b in 0.235 seconds.