A Critique of the Odious Debt Doctrine
Albert H. Choi
University of Virginia School of Law
Eric A. Posner
University of Chicago - Law School
U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 323
Defenders of the odious debt doctrine, which bars creditors from collecting sovereign debts that financed the personal consumption of former dictators, argue that this rule would benefit populations following dictatorships and discourage would-be dictators from staging coups in the first place. We show that optimism about the doctrine is based on unrealistic assumptions about the motives and practices of dictators. With more realistic assumptions, the odious debt doctrine could be beneficial or harmful, depending on circumstances. Defenders of the doctrine have not made the empirical case that the net benefits would be positive if the doctrine were incorporated into international law, and there is ample reason for skepticism that they would be.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22working papers series
Date posted: January 17, 2007
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 2.313 seconds