|
||||
|
||||
The Never-Was-Neutral Net and Why Informed End Users Can End the Net Neutrality Debates
Douglas A. Hass Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington; The Skye Group Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 22, p. 1563, 2008 Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 82 Abstract: Internet service providers and their customers have understood and debated the concepts of network neutrality, tiered access, and limited "unlimited" services since the beginning of the era of dial-up bulletin board systems. Commentators have only recently joined the debate, and often overlook history. No commentator, legislator, or regulator can be certain how networks and technologies will evolve over the next decade - especially when they misunderstand how those networks evolved over the last one. This article refocuses the net neutrality debate on end users rather than networks by analyzing the Internet's non-neutral history, examining today's non-neutral Internet access and content markets, and discussing important economic arguments and game theory in light of technical and operational realities on Internet networks. The article outlines a policy of categorized, detailed, and uniform disclosures about Internet and content providers' non-neutral traffic policies. The disclosures would enable the market to choose technologies and business models dynamically, yet still provide regulators with a potential enforcement mechanism.
Keywords: net neutrality, FCC, broadband, Internet, antitrust, economics JEL Classifications: K1, K19, K21, K2, K20, K30, K39, K00 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 18, 2007 ; Last revised: March 26, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo5b in 0.453 seconds.