The Many Faces of Darlene Jespersen
George Washington University Law School
Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Vol. 14, p. 465, 2007
GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 238
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 238
This essay was written for a symposium on the case Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., in which Darlene Jespersen challenged Harrah's policy that required its female employees to wear makeup. In this essay, I explore the applicable case law, focusing specifically on the emerging law of sexual stereotyping to explain why the law was unwilling to recognize Jespersen's claim. In addition, I suggest that Jespersen's case is symptomatic of the way in which we have come to expect too much both from work and from courts. The workplace is typically not a place to express our identities and the fact that we often look to work as a place for authenticity, speech, democracy, or sex, simply confirms that we place too much importance on the workplace for our lives. Relatedly, it seems unrealistic to expect that courts would find a policy requiring makeup to be demeaning to women, or stereotypical in some way, as Jespersen argued, given that our existing social norms embrace makeup rather than condemn it. Finally, I conclude that this case is really more about power and status - the limited power and status of someone like Darlene Jespersen who worked as a bartender - rather than about the failings of antidiscrimination law.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: sexual stereotyping , social norms, employment law, workplace, antidiscrimination law, gender, women, status, employment discrimination, Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co.
JEL Classification: J70, J71, J16Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 19, 2007
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.500 seconds