Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=957829
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



The New Judicial Hostility to Arbitration: Federal Preemption, Contract Unconscionability, and Agreements to Arbitrate


Steven J. Burton


University of Iowa - College of Law


Journal of Dispute Resolution, Forthcoming
U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-01

Abstract:     
Since 2000, many courts have been holding agreements to arbitrate in consumer and employment contracts unconscionable and therefore unenforceable. Professor Burton makes two arguments in relation to these cases. First, many of the reasons on which these courts rely are pre-empted under the Supreme Court's arbitration law jurisprudence, which endorses a strong federal policy favoring arbitration. Second, and related, many of the courts' reasonings do not justify findings of unconscionability as the doctrine exists in general contract law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: judicial hostility, agreements to arbitrate, unconscionability, federal preemption

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 7, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Burton, Steven J., The New Judicial Hostility to Arbitration: Federal Preemption, Contract Unconscionability, and Agreements to Arbitrate. Journal of Dispute Resolution, Forthcoming; U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=957829

Contact Information

Steven J. Burton (Contact Author)
University of Iowa - College of Law ( email )
Melrose and Byington
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 635
Downloads: 132
Download Rank: 131,381
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds