Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=958278
 
 

References (53)



 


 



Sentencing as Craftwork and the Binary Epistemologies of the Discretionary Decision Process


Cyrus Tata


University of Strathclyde, Glasgow


Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 16, 2007

Abstract:     
This article contends that it is time to take a critical look at a series of binary categories which have dominated the scholarly and reform epistemologies of the sentencing decision process. These binaries are: rules versus discretion; reason versus emotion; offence versus offender; normative principles versus incoherence, aggravating versus mitigating factors; aggregate/tariff consistency versus individualised sentencing. These binaries underpin both the 'legal-rational' tradition (by which I mean a view of discretion as inherently suspect; a preference for the use of philosophy of punishment justifications; and an explanation of the decision process through factors or variables); and also the more recent rise of the 'new penology'. Both approaches tend to rely on 'top-down' assumptions of change, which pay limited attention to the agency of penal workers.

The article seeks to develop a conception of sentencing craftwork as a social and interpretive process. In so doing, it applies and develops a number of Kritzer's observations about craftwork (in this edition of this journal) to sentencing. These are: problem solving (applied to the rules-discretion and reason-emotion dichotomies); skills and techniques (normative penal principles and the use of cognitive analytical assumptions); consistency (tariff versus individualised sentencing); clientele (applied to account-giving and the reality of decision-making versus expression). By conceiving of sentencing as craftwork, the binary epistemologies of the sentencing decision process, which have dominated (and limited) the scholarly and policy sentencing imaginations, are revealed as dynamic, contingent, and synergistic. However, this is not to say that such binaries are no more than empty rhetoric concealing the reality of the decision process. Rather, these binaries serve as crucial legitimating reference points in the vocabulary of sentencing account-giving.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: sentencing, discretion, judging, punishment, craft, disparity, courts

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 19, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Tata, Cyrus, Sentencing as Craftwork and the Binary Epistemologies of the Discretionary Decision Process. Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 16, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=958278

Contact Information

Cyrus Tata (Contact Author)
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow ( email )
16 Richmond Street
Glasgow 1XQ, Scotland
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 610
Downloads: 87
Download Rank: 178,675
References:  53

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.265 seconds