The Resource Curse Revisited and Revised: A Tale of Paradoxes and Red Herrings
Christa N. Brunnschweiler
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) - Department of Economics; University of Oxford - OxCarre
Erwin H. Bulte
Tilburg University - Department of Economics; Wageningen University
CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research at ETH Zurich, Working Paper No. 06/61
We critically evaluate the empirical basis for the so-called resource curse and find that, despite the topic's popularity in economics and political science research, this apparent paradox is a red herring. The most commonly used measure of 'resource abundance' can be more usefully interpreted as a proxy for 'resource dependence' - endogenous to underlying institutional factors. In multiple estimations that combine resource abundance and dependence, institutional and constitutional variables, we find that (i) resource abundance, constitutions and institutions determine resource dependence, (ii) resource dependence does not affect growth, and (iii) resource abundance positively affects growth and institutional quality.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 38
Keywords: Natural resource curse, economic growth, growth regressions, political regimes, institutions, constitutions
JEL Classification: O11, O13, Q0working papers series
Date posted: February 7, 2007
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.484 seconds