The (In)Equities of Federal Indian Law
Kathryn E Fort
Indigenous Law & Policy Center, Michigan State University College of Law
MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 04-24
The Federal Lawyer, Vol. 54, No. 32
In 2005, the Supreme Court used the equitable defenses of laches, acquiescence and impossibility to dismiss the Oneida Indian Nation's request to remove its land from city tax roles. Later cases have extended the use of these defenses into other New York land claims. This article traces the historical origins of these three defenses, the origins of equity in England and the United States and provides some suggestions to Indian law practitioners bringing either land claims or treaty rights cases.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13
Keywords: Indian, tribe, land claim, equity, lachesAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 26, 2007
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds