Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=959675
 
 

Footnotes (97)



 


 



Rule 68 Offers of Judgment: The Practices and Opinions of Experienced Civil Rights and Employment Discrimination Attorneys


Harold S. Lewis Jr.


Mercer University

Thomas A. Eaton


University of Georgia Law School

January 2007

University of Georgia Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-002

Abstract:     
We were interested in learning why Rule 68 is not a more prominent feature of civil rights and employment discrimination litigation. Why is it not used more frequently in the very types of cases in which defendants have the greatest economic incentive to make offers and plaintiffs have the most to lose if they refuse them? We harbor no illusion that Rule 68 is a panacea for dispute resolution. But it is one tool for ratcheting up the pressures for an early settlement with a measure of legal compulsion. Our interest in Rule 68 is not driven by the belief that too many cases go to trial. Indeed, it appears that the civil trial has become a notable rarity - by one respected account, more than 98% of federal civil litigation is resolved by means other than trials. Nevertheless, Rule 68 may harbor the potential to speed up the settlement process and thereby produce significant economic savings to the parties, with correlative savings to the courts and the taxpayers who fund them.

Our contribution to the policy discussion is to report the views of experienced practicing attorneys who decide on a daily basis whether to make or accept offers of judgment. We conducted in-person, in-depth interviews with sixty-four experienced litigators who prosecute and defend civil rights and employment discrimination claims. This is the first such nationwide empirical inquiry into the incidence of practitioner use of Rule 68 in the federal fee-authorization cases where, after Marek, one would expect its use to be most common.

Part II describes the methodology we used in constructing this study. Part III discusses the technical aspects of Rule 68 and how they might contribute to use or non-use of offers of judgment. Part IV confirms the anecdotal evidence that Rule 68 plays little role in civil rights or employment discrimination litigation throughout most of the nation's federal courts. However, there are a few districts where Rule 68 has become a more than occasional part of evaluating and processing civil rights, although not employment discrimination, cases. Part IV also summarizes the primary reasons advanced by experienced attorneys for the infrequent use of Rule 68. Part V reports on the reactions of these attorneys to various proposals for reform.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: Rule 68, Offer of judgment, Marek

JEL Classification: K41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 28, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Lewis, Harold S. and Eaton, Thomas A., Rule 68 Offers of Judgment: The Practices and Opinions of Experienced Civil Rights and Employment Discrimination Attorneys (January 2007). University of Georgia Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=959675 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.959675

Contact Information

Harold S. Lewis Jr.
Mercer University ( email )
1400 Coleman Avenue
Atlanta, GA 30341-4155
United States
Thomas A. Eaton (Contact Author)
University of Georgia Law School ( email )
Athens, GA 30602
United States
706-542-5177 (Phone)
706-542-5556 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,367
Downloads: 212
Download Rank: 79,394
Footnotes:  97

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.766 seconds