Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=960414
 


 



Assisted Reproductive Technology & The Double-Bind: The Illusory Choice of Motherhood


Michele Goodwin


University of Minnesota Law School


Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-54, Fall 2005

Abstract:     
This article argues that assisted reproductive technology (ART) is mistakenly regarded as equitable accommodation for women and their families who wish to delay pregnancies in order to avoid discrimination. Pregnancy and motherhood discrimination, I argue, are "soft," but real discrimination that create "double binds" for women who believe they must choose between the pursuit of a career and early motherhood. For these young women, they understand or are advised by older women to delay pregnancy to increase their chances of "fair" opportunity at law firms, businesses, or university posts. This article describes this type of discrimination as "soft" because it exists without an actual act committed against a woman, the perception of discrimination is subjective, and therefore might be difficult to prove in traditional modes of adjudication. Yet, studies confirm that young women increasingly delay pregnancies, often against their preference, in order to avoid employment discrimination or the "pink collar" glass ceiling.

Existing public policy ignores this type of invidious discrimination and even accommodates it by promoting assisted reproductive technology as the solution to early career challenges. Yet reliance on ART to resolve this larger public policy issue detracts from addressing pregnancy and motherhood discrimination in the workplace and levies the burden on women to use biotechnology to resolve inequitable treatment in employment settings. In this context public policy refuses to hold law firms, corporations, and universities accountable for soft discrimination. Further, as demonstrated in this article, ART treatments pose very serious health risks to mothers and fetuses, and thus are not real options, but an illusory choice of motherhood and career advancement.

This article addresses law, culture, and science of reproductive technology, focusing primarily on the maternal double bind nurtured by dynamics of unequal structural relationships in society.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: biotechnology, assisted reproduction, motherhood, discrimination, law, medicine

JEL Classification: D1, D6, I00

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 31, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Goodwin, Michele, Assisted Reproductive Technology & The Double-Bind: The Illusory Choice of Motherhood. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-54, Fall 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=960414

Contact Information

Michele Goodwin (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,983
Downloads: 281
Download Rank: 61,260

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.438 seconds