Abstract

 


 



Semiotics, Analogical Legal Reasoning, And The Cf. Citation: Getting Our Signals Uncrossed


Ira P. Robbins


American University - Washington College of Law


Duke Law Journal, Vol. 48, p. 1043, 1999

Abstract:     
The Bluebook's introductory citation signals are essential to effective legal discourse. The choice of signal can influence not only the interpretation of cited cases, but also the path of law. In this Article, Professor Ira Robins examines one commonly used signal: the cf. After exploring its semiotic function, he details the multitude of ways in which this signal has been used and misused. He argues that lawyers' and judges' careless use of the cf. leads to confusing and often incoherent developments in the law, and concludes by proposing a precise working definition for this irksome, but potentially powerful, citation signal.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: Semiotics, Signal, Legal Reasoning, Bluebook, Common Law, Introductory Signals, Legal Citation

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K40, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 31, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Robbins, Ira P., Semiotics, Analogical Legal Reasoning, And The Cf. Citation: Getting Our Signals Uncrossed. Duke Law Journal, Vol. 48, p. 1043, 1999. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=960471

Contact Information

Ira P. Robbins (Contact Author)
American University - Washington College of Law ( email )
4801 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
United States
202-274-4235 (Phone)
202-274-4130 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,092
Downloads: 409
Download Rank: 33,200

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.047 seconds