Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=961619
 


 



Meeting Expectations: Two Profiles for Specific Jurisdiction


Linda Sandstrom Simard


Suffolk University Law School


Indiana Law Review, Vol. 38, p. 343, 2005

Abstract:     
Personal jurisdiction doctrine is based upon the notion that the exercise of authority over a defendant is fair if the defendant has the ability to predict and control its jurisdictional exposure. Yet, the Supreme Court has neglected to clearly define the criteria by which courts are to define the scope of either general or specific personal jurisdiction, leading to a blurring of the concepts and disagreement among courts and scholars as to the appropriate contours of both types of jurisdiction. This Article focuses on defining the scope of specific jurisdiction to accurately reflect the purpose of the doctrine and suggests that it is a mistake to assume that all assertions of specific jurisdiction may be defined according to a single set of criteria. Rather, the purpose of specific jurisdiction is best achieved by creating two profiles of specific jurisdiction, episodic specific jurisdiction and systematic specific jurisdiction. These profiles would share the basic characteristics of specific jurisdiction (conferring limited jurisdictional authority) while also recognizing that the scope of specific jurisdiction should depend upon whether the defendant expects its forum conduct to be of a finite nature (which would confer a narrower scope of specific jurisdiction) or whether the defendant intends to create an ongoing, systematic relationship with the forum (which would create a broader scope of specific jurisdiction, but one that is still less expansive than general jurisdiction).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: personal jurisdiction, minimum contacts, specific jurisdiction, general jurisdiction, nexus, dispute specific jurisdiction

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 7, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Simard, Linda Sandstrom, Meeting Expectations: Two Profiles for Specific Jurisdiction. Indiana Law Review, Vol. 38, p. 343, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=961619

Contact Information

Linda Sandstrom Simard (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 635
Downloads: 47

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.609 seconds