Footnotes (27)



Of Frivolous Litigation and Runaway Juries: A View from the Bench

Thomas A. Eaton

University of Georgia Law School

Georgia Law Review, Forthcoming
University of Georgia Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-004

The political case for tort reform is based in large measure on the perception that there are too many frivolous law suits and too many excessive jury awards. While there is considerable empirical evidence casting doubt on both these propositions, they remain the linchpins of the tort reform movement. Scholars, lobbyists, and legislators all have had a voice in the tort reform debates. The viewpoints of trial judges, however, have been largely absent. This is unfortunate because trial judges are the government officials with the closest view of the tort litigation system. They are the ones who see tort litigation on a day-in, day-out basis and are therefore uniquely qualified to comment on the extent of problems in the system. This study begins to fill this void by reporting on the views of Georgia Superior Court and State Court judges on tort litigation in their courts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: Juries, Tort Reform, Georgia

JEL Classification: K13, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 7, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Eaton, Thomas A., Of Frivolous Litigation and Runaway Juries: A View from the Bench. Georgia Law Review, Forthcoming; University of Georgia Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=961833

Contact Information

Thomas A. Eaton (Contact Author)
University of Georgia Law School ( email )
225 Herty Drive
Athens, GA 30602
United States
706-542-5177 (Phone)
706-542-5556 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 935
Downloads: 143
Download Rank: 153,572
Footnotes:  27

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 4.656 seconds