Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=962270
 
 

References (8)



 


 



Who Wins in a Dynamic World: Theory of Constraints Vs. Activity-Based Costing?


Robin Cooper


Emory University - Goizueta Business School

David A. Bray


National Defense University - Information Resources Management College; Emory University - Department of Decision & Information Analysis

Michael I. Parzen


Emory University - Goizueta Business School

January 2007

North American Assoc. for Computational Social and Organizational Science (NAACSOS) Conference, June 2007

Abstract:     
Two system-based views exist regarding managerial value chain analysis: Theory of Constraints (TOC) and Activity-Based Costing (ABC). There has been considerable debate whether TOC or ABC is the more optimal approach for strategic planning. This study seeks to compare TOC and ABC, while keeping constant the level of environmental turbulence each of the approaches encounter. With regard to organizational systems, literature regarding complex adaptive systems supports the idea that bottom-up approaches are more resilient to volatility. Consequently, this study hypothesizes that the bottom-up ABC approach will prove more agile and less limiting than the top-down TOC approach. This study then performs two computational experiments. The first experiment reveals that the ABC approach generated more PROFIT than the TOC approach, while the TOC produced a larger amount of REVENUE, for all instances of the simulation. The second experiment reveals that a hybrid TOC+ABC approach is the most optimal in the midst of environmental turbulence out of four possibilities. This hybrid TOC+ABC selects a first cut of orders that will generate the highest REVENUES per the TOC approach, and then selects a second cut of orders that will have the lowest COSTS and thus the highest PROFIT per the ABC approach. These results challenge the established literature espousing the TOC approach alone.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: Theory of Constraints (TOC), Activity-Based Costing (ABC), value chain analysis, strategic planning, bottom-up approaches, environmental turbulence

JEL Classification: D23, D21, D81

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 9, 2007 ; Last revised: January 21, 2008

Suggested Citation

Cooper, Robin and Bray, David A. and Parzen , Michael I., Who Wins in a Dynamic World: Theory of Constraints Vs. Activity-Based Costing? (January 2007). North American Assoc. for Computational Social and Organizational Science (NAACSOS) Conference, June 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=962270 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.962270

Contact Information

Robin Cooper (Contact Author)
Emory University - Goizueta Business School ( email )
1300 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322-2722
United States
David A. Bray
National Defense University - Information Resources Management College ( email )
Washington, DC
HOME PAGE: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dbray
Emory University - Department of Decision & Information Analysis ( email )
1300 Clifton Road - details at http://dbray.org
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.fc.bus.emory.edu/~dbray/
Michael I. Parzen
Emory University - Goizueta Business School ( email )
1300 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322-2722
United States
404-727-6110 (Phone)
404-727-2053 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 26,280
Downloads: 6,930
Download Rank: 393
References:  8

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds