Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=962561
 
 

Footnotes (185)



 


 



Patent Systems: More Easily Faulted than Fixed


Thomas G. Field Jr.


University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)

February 11, 2007


Abstract:     
The U.S. patent system has been the subject of three recent, generally critical, studies. One, particularly uncomplimentary, primarily faults a changed source of funds for patent examination and creation of a court that, aside from the Supreme Court, has exclusive jurisdiction to consider patent appeals, both administrative and judicial. This paper explains why neither criticism is well taken. It also analyzes reactions of the U.S. Congress and Supreme Court to allegedly new problems caused by so-called patent thickets and patent trolls.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: innovation, patent critics, patent reform, invalid patents, patent examination cost, patent litigation cost, patent courts, comparative roles of judge and juror, patent infringement, patent remedies, patent thicket, patent troll, doctrine of equivalents, obviousness

JEL Classification: O31, O38

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 10, 2008 ; Last revised: March 12, 2013

Suggested Citation

Field, Thomas G., Patent Systems: More Easily Faulted than Fixed (February 11, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=962561

Contact Information

Thomas G. Field Jr. (Contact Author)
University of New Hampshire School of Law ( email )
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,446
Downloads: 232
Download Rank: 76,906
Footnotes:  185
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.421 seconds