SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Patent Systems: More Easily Faulted than Fixed

Thomas G. Field Jr.
Franklin Pierce Law Center




Abstract:     
The U.S. patent system has been the subject of three recent, generally critical, studies. One, particularly uncomplimentary, primarily faults a changed source of funds for patent examination and creation of a court that, aside from the Supreme Court, has exclusive jurisdiction to consider patent appeals, both administrative and judicial. This paper explains why neither criticism is well taken. It also analyzes reactions of the U.S. Congress and Supreme Court to allegedly new problems caused by so-called patent thickets and patent trolls.

Keywords: innovation, patent critics, patent reform, invalid patents, patent examination cost, patent litigation cost, patent courts, comparative roles of judge and juror, patent infringement, patent remedies, patent thicket, patent troll, doctrine of equivalents, obviousness

JEL Classifications: O31, O38

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: December 10, 2008 ; Last revised: January 20, 2009

Suggested Citation

Field, Thomas G., Patent Systems: More Easily Faulted than Fixed (February 11, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=962561


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Thomas G. Field Jr. (Contact Author)
Franklin Pierce Law Center ( email )
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 602
Downloads: 153
Download Rank: 55,420

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 2 in 0.141 seconds.