Citations (2)


Footnotes (103)



The Five Indicia of Virtual Property

Charles Blazer

University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)

Pierce Law Review, Vol. 5, p. 137, 2006

Building on the analysis of Professor Joshua Fairfield, from his seminal article titled Virtual Property, this note proposes five indicia, common to most forms of virtual property, which a court should use to identify legally protectable virtual property interests on the Internet. These indicia are: (1) rivalry; (2) persistence; (3) interconnectivity; (4) secondary markets; and (5) value-added-by-users. This note cautions, however, against applying this framework indiscriminately against the interests of the very entities without whom the property would not exist. The ultimate purpose of virtual property jurisprudence should be to strike a balance that provides legal redress to users whose legitimate property interests have been violated while simultaneously reducing liability and disincentives to service providers who promote and sustain the growth of the Internet.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 14, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Blazer, Charles, The Five Indicia of Virtual Property. Pierce Law Review, Vol. 5, p. 137, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=962905

Contact Information

Charles Blazer (Contact Author)
University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center) ( email )
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,704
Downloads: 652
Download Rank: 25,327
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  103

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.313 seconds