Abstract

 
 

References (75)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



The Two-Party System under Alternative Voting Procedures


Arnaud Dellis


Universite Laval - Department of Economics; CIRPEE

May 2011


Abstract:     
Countries that elect their policy-makers by means of Plurality Voting tend to have a two-party system. This observation can be explained by the strategic behavior of voters. The present paper derives two broad classes of voting procedures under which strategic voting behavior induces a two-party system under standard assumptions on voter preferences. One class consists of the voting procedures with unique top-score, i.e., under which a voter can cast a top-score vote for only one candidate (e.g., Plurality Voting, Borda Count). The other class consists of the voting procedures that permit truncated ballots, i.e., under which voters do not have to cast all their votes (e.g., Approval Voting). The present analysis suggests that the key for strategic voting behavior to induce a two-party system is that voters can always cast a different score for the two candidates they rank first and second on their ballots.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Duverger's Law, Two-Party System, Strategic Voting, Voting Procedures

JEL Classification: C72, D72

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 10, 2007 ; Last revised: May 24, 2011

Suggested Citation

Dellis, Arnaud, The Two-Party System under Alternative Voting Procedures (May 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=963660 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.963660

Contact Information

Arnaud Dellis (Contact Author)
Universite Laval - Department of Economics ( email )
1250 Ave Sciences-Humaines, local 2174
Quebec, Quebec G1V 0A6
Canada
HOME PAGE: http://sites.google.com/site/arnauddellis/
CIRPEE ( email )
Pavillon De Sève
Ste-Foy, Quebec G1K 7P4
Canada
HOME PAGE: http://132.203.59.36/CIRPEE/index_en.html
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 751
Downloads: 128
Download Rank: 113,220
References:  75
Citations:  3

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.438 seconds