Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=963994
 
 

Footnotes (286)



 


 



The Field Theory: Martial Law, the Suspension Power, and the Insurrection Act


Stephen I. Vladeck


American University - Washington College of Law


Temple Law Review, Vol. 80, 2007
American University, WCL Research Paper No. 08-01

Abstract:     
In Ex parte Merryman, Chief Justice Taney famously rejected President Lincoln's power to unilaterally suspend the writ of habeas corpus in and around Baltimore at the outset of the U.S. Civil War. According to Taney, only Congress can provide for suspension of the writ, and Congress had not so provided. Just one year later, though, the Vermont federal circuit court held, in Ex parte Field, that the suspension of habeas corpus is necessarily coincident to the imposition of martial law. Because President Lincoln had the statutory authority to impose martial law by virtue of the so-called Militia Acts, Field concluded, Congress had effectively, if not explicitly, given sanction to Lincoln's suspension of habeas in those areas where martial law was validly in force.

This Article attempts a thorough reconstruction of the Field theory, beginning with the facts of Merryman itself before moving to the pre-Civil War precedents on which the decision in Field relied. As it concludes, the President's authority to impose martial law in crisis situations does in fact derive from the Militia Acts, and there is at least a colorable argument that Baltimore was under martial law at the time Merryman was decided. More importantly for present purposes, though, the Article analyzes the deep and profound questions as to the substantive preconditions for the imposition of martial law through the lens of the modern-day Insurrection Act, concluding that the statutory framework, in current form, does not adequately demarcate the point past which martial law is appropriate. Because Congress has the power to provide for the calling forth of the military to respond to domestic crises, Congress can provide for greater accountability - especially at the end of the next emergency - and, the Article concludes, Congress should do so.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: Merryman, Taney, Lincoln, martial law, martial rule, habeas corpus, civil war, emergencies, Andrew Jackson, Dorr

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 21, 2007 ; Last revised: January 20, 2008

Suggested Citation

Vladeck, Stephen I., The Field Theory: Martial Law, the Suspension Power, and the Insurrection Act. Temple Law Review, Vol. 80, 2007; American University, WCL Research Paper No. 08-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=963994

Contact Information

Stephen I. Vladeck (Contact Author)
American University - Washington College of Law ( email )
4801 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
United States
202-274-4241 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,563
Downloads: 321
Download Rank: 51,916
Footnotes:  286

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.360 seconds