Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=963996
 
 

Citations (13)



 
 

Footnotes (74)



 


 



Rethinking Patent Law's Presumption of Validity


Douglas Lichtman


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Mark A. Lemley


Stanford Law School


Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, p. 45, 2007
UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 07-12
Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 963996
Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 353

Abstract:     
The United States Patent and Trademark Office is tasked with the job of reading patent applications and determining which ones qualify for patent protection. It is a Herculean task, and the Patent Office pursues it subject to enormous informational and budgetary constraints. Nonetheless, under current law, courts are bound to defer to the Patent Office's decisions regarding patent validity. In this Article, we argue for reform. Deference to previous decision-makers is appropriate in instances where those previous decisions have a high likelihood of accuracy, and the patent system should endeavor to create processes that fit this mold. But granting significant deference to the initial process of patent review is indefensible and counter-productive. Patents should be vulnerable to challenge until and unless they are significantly evaluated in an information-rich environment. At that point, they will have earned and therefore should be accorded a presumption of validity. Such an approach would better serve the patent's systems long-run incentive goals, and it would give patent applicants better incentives to file for genuine inventions but leave their more obvious and incremental accomplishments outside the patent system's purview. Here, we therefore suggest the creation of a two-tier system of patent validity, with patents that are subject to intensive scrutiny accorded a strong presumption of validity, while untested patents are left to be evaluated more fully in court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: patent law, patents, patent review, presumption, presumption of validity

JEL Classification: K3

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 2, 2007 ; Last revised: February 6, 2011

Suggested Citation

Lichtman, Douglas and Lemley, Mark A., Rethinking Patent Law's Presumption of Validity. Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, p. 45, 2007; UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 07-12; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 963996; Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 353. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=963996

Contact Information

Douglas Gary Lichtman (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-267-4617 (Phone)
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,033
Downloads: 702
Download Rank: 18,139
Citations:  13
Footnotes:  74

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.406 seconds