Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=964035
 
 

References (29)



 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Dissolving (In)Effective Partnerships


John L. Turner


University of Georgia - C. Herman and Mary Virginia Terry College of Business - Department of Economics

June 12, 2012


Abstract:     
This paper studies the problem of partnership dissolution in the context of asymmetric information. Past work shows that the initial share allocation, interdependence of partners’ valuations, and asymmetric control all affect the possibility of efficient dissolution. In this paper, I show, in a novel class of “cooperative” partnerships characterized by ex ante interdependence of valuations, that effectiveness is significantly more important than the initial share allocation. Intuitively, as the effectiveness of cooperation between partners (and thus partnership value) increases, the gains from dissolving decrease but the informational rents remain constant, so efficient dissolution is more difficult to achieve. For sufficiently high effectiveness, efficient dissolution is impossible for any initial share allocation. For sufficiently low effectiveness, however, efficient dissolution is possible for all initial share allocations. The possibility of efficient bargaining depends on the initial share allocation only for moderately effective partnerships.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: Mechanism design, trading, dissolution, partnerships

JEL Classification: C72, D82, L14

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 24, 2008 ; Last revised: June 20, 2012

Suggested Citation

Turner, John L., Dissolving (In)Effective Partnerships (June 12, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=964035 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.964035

Contact Information

John L. Turner (Contact Author)
University of Georgia - C. Herman and Mary Virginia Terry College of Business - Department of Economics ( email )
Athens, GA 30602-6254
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 732
Downloads: 102
Download Rank: 154,263
References:  29
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds