Stephen J. Lubben
Seton Hall University - School of Law
American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Forthcoming
Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 964214
In this paper I revisit the data used in The Other Liquidation Decision to further examine the important question of liquidation of American businesses under chapters 7 and 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. In particular, I utilize a propensity score matching technique to address the differences between the chapter 7 and 11 cases in the sample. I also examine the use of weighted data to address the original study's selection protocols.
Some results are predictable: for example, unsecured creditors sometimes fare much better in chapter 11 liquidations. But other results are likely to surprise academics and chapter 11 practitioners alike. For example, even under a chapter 11 liquidation plan the median recovery to unsecured creditors is zero. At least half of the unsecured creditors will suffer a complete loss, regardless of the procedure the debtor uses to liquidate. And very few creditors ultimately receive the benefits of a chapter 11 liquidation - most chapter 11 cases convert to chapter 7 and very few liquidating plans are ultimately confirmed. Only 81 of 202 chapter 11 debtors in the sample filed plans, and only 43 of those plans were actually confirmed. Chapter 7 is thus the prevailing method of business liquidation, although a sizable number of firms first attempt either a reorganization or liquidation under chapter 11.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 42
Keywords: bankruptcy, liquidation, business, chapter 11, chapter 7, insolvencyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 21, 2007
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.421 seconds