|
||||
|
||||
Auditing Politics or Political Auditing?Anne Joseph O'ConnellUniversity of California, Berkeley - School of Law February 21, 2007 UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 964656 Abstract: I investigate the relationship between Congress and the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The GAO is the federal legislature's primary auditor of the administrative state, evaluating agency programs on its own initiative, by statutory mandate, and at the request of members of Congress. I begin with a basic two-period principal-agent model between a legislature and an auditor, where the auditor must choose between two opportunities for self-initiated oversight in each period. The model identifies how the auditor, who must consider how neutrality or political bias, or the perceptions of either, acts given her own interests and the objectives of the legislature. The model also shows how the legislature can create socially optimal as well as socially perverse incentives for its auditor. I then explore empirically some of the model's assumptions and implications with data on the GAO's self-initiated investigations from 1978 to 1998. The empirical results support the theory that the GAO is a nonpartisan auditor facing some political constraints.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 56 Keywords: Expertise, reputation, information, GAO, Congress JEL Classification: C70, D72, D80, H11, K23 working papers seriesDate posted: February 23, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.563 seconds