'Misconvictions', Science, and the Ministers of Justice
Jane Campbell Moriarty
Duquesne University - School of Law
Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2007
U of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-20
This article provides a new perspective on wrongful convictions - what I term misconvictions. Focusing on the intersection of ethics and expert evidence in criminal cases, the article specifically considers the role of judges and prosecutors, collectively referred to as the ministers of justice. The article has a dual focus: first, to explain the forensic science concerns that contribute to misconvictions; and second, to contemplate the ethical roles that the ministers of justice have in creating misconvictions by their management of expert evidence. In addition to explaining how problematic forensic science can contribute to wrongful convictions, the article details the ethical concerns of prosecutorial and judicial acts and omissions. The article concludes with some suggested changes of a legal and ethical nature that might help reduce the rate of misconvictions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 42
Keywords: criminal law, prosecutor, expert evidence, ethics, foresnic science, wrongful convictions
JEL Classification: K1
Date posted: February 23, 2007 ; Last revised: February 2, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.531 seconds