Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=964793
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (180)



 


 



How Do You Solve a Problem Like in Kelo?


Debra Pogrund Stark


The John Marshall Law School


John Marshall Law Review, Vol. 40, 2007

Abstract:     
This article analyzes one of the most controversial recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions and demonstrates that the common perception of the Kelo case, that now the government can take any property under the 5th Amendment if they simply allege or show that the new use of the property will achieve a higher economic use, is a misreading of the majority and concurring opinions in Kelo. The article then argues that the Kelo decision is still very troubling for the dicta in the majority, concurring, and even Justice O'Connor's dissenting opinion, that judges should show extreme deference to a legislative judgment of public use and not to "second guess" legislative judgments. The article then reviews all of the cases cited to by the Court in Berman and Midkiff (the two key cases relied upon by the Court in Kelo) and demonstrates that none of them provide support for this extreme judicial deference in the context of a non-traditional taking. Consequently, the Court is in a very strong position to re-examine the continued applicability of this deferential approach in the context of non-traditional takings. Rather than interpret public use to exclude all such non-traditional exercises of eminent domain, this article suggests that an approach that better comports with the legitimate functions of the legislative and judicial branches is for courts to more closely scrutinize these takings to make sure that the alleged public benefits from the taking are real rather pretextual or highly speculative and to increase the level of review when the taking will lead to high uncompensated subjective values to home owners. The article concludes by developing three distinct categories of takings and specific appropriate levels of judicial review and legislative burdens for each category in order to restore the system of checks and balances between the legislative and judicial branches that are essential to the American Constitutional system.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Fifth Amendment, Kelo Decision

JEL Classification: H70, O10

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 28, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Stark, Debra Pogrund, How Do You Solve a Problem Like in Kelo?. John Marshall Law Review, Vol. 40, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=964793

Contact Information

Debra Pogrund Stark (Contact Author)
The John Marshall Law School ( email )
315 South Plymouth Court
Chicago, IL 60604
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 663
Downloads: 112
Download Rank: 143,161
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  180

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.360 seconds