The Unforeseen Ethical Ramifications of Classroom Faculty Participation in Law School Clinics
Laura L. Rovner
University of Denver Sturm College of Law
University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 75, 2007
U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-18
The past decade has seen an enormous expansion in both the types of clinical programs offered by law schools and the role of clinical education in the law school curriculum. With this development has come greater involvement on the part of classroom faculty in clinical programs, who are increasingly collaborating with clinic faculty and students in clinic cases in a variety of ways. In this article, Professor Rovner asserts that such collaborations, as desirable as they may be for the practical and pedagogical benefits they offer, also may present significant ethical issues for faculty, students and clients.
This article analyzes some of the most common professional responsibility issues that may develop when classroom faculty work with law school clinics, focusing in particular on the areas of unauthorized practice of law, confidentiality and conflicts of interest. In the article, Professor Rovner identifies the multilayered ethical considerations that arise from classroom faculty involvement in clinics, develops a systematic taxonomy that promotes a better understanding of these concerns, and proposes a series of best practices that law schools might adopt to address, and perhaps prevent, ethical violations from arising.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 89Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 26, 2007 ; Last revised: December 9, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.484 seconds