SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (118)

Beta

 


 



The Constitutional Paradox Posed By Permitting Polygamy in India

Kinari Patel
Dewey & LeBoeuf


February 24, 2007


Abstract:     
By comparing Indian polygamy law to U.S. polygamy law, this paper examines and suggests ways of resolving the constitutional paradox posed by permitting polygamy among Muslim men in India. Specifically, this paper first contends that U.S. law prohibiting polygamy among all religious groups is constitutional because it does not violate the free exercise of religion clause of the First Amendment or the equal protection or due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. This paper then argues that legislation in India, prohibiting polygamy among Hindus yet allowing polygamy among Muslims, is unconstitutional because it violates the equal protection provisions of Articles 14 and 15 of the Indian Constitution. This paper further asserts that India should follow the U.S. by beginning to address the problem of lax enforcement of its current polygamy law and by taking concrete steps towards enacting legislation that prohibits polygamy across all religious denominations.

Keywords: Polygamy India Constitution

Working Paper Series

Date posted: February 26, 2007 ; Last revised: May 21, 2007

Suggested Citation

Patel, Kinari, The Constitutional Paradox Posed By Permitting Polygamy in India (February 24, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=965200


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Kinari Patel (Contact Author)
Dewey & LeBoeuf ( email )
1101 New York Avenue, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,605
Downloads: 120
Download Rank: 72,029
Footnotes: 118

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.125 seconds.