Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=965775
 
 

Footnotes (336)



 


 



Judging the Aesthetics of Billboards


David Burnett


University of Virginia - School of Law, Alumnus or Degree Candidate Author


Journal of Law and Politics, Spring 2007

Abstract:     
This Note is a cultural and judicial history of billboard regulation in the United States, with particular emphasis on how the public and the courts have judged billboards' aesthetic qualities. I find that the American public and our courts have generally agreed that billboards are unattractive and deserve to be regulated. In the earliest billboard-related opinions, in the first decade of the twentieth century, courts sometimes struck down billboard ordinances as unconstitutional takings of advertisers' private property. However, as municipalities' police power broadened and public opposition to billboards mounted, courts became more receptive to increasingly expansive billboard regulation, first premised on safety and health rationales and ultimately based on aesthetic reasons alone. After a half-century of judicial deference during which billboard laws were generally upheld, such laws have again come under fire in recent decades for violating advertisers' free-speech rights. The Note concludes with a description of current law related to billboard regulation and current advocacy for and against such restrictions.

It is no coincidence that American courts expanded their definition of municipal police-power authority, particularly as applied to aesthetic regulation, at the same time as billboards were spreading throughout the country and arousing widespread public disfavor. In fact, it appears that courts were responding to public opinion about billboards by facilitating regulation of these conspicuous eyesores. The courts' responsiveness reminds us that our judicial system is subsumed within, and thus reflects, the broader American culture. The courts' sensitivity to social values is both understandable and beneficial, showing that the courts are indeed majoritarian and that our common law - in this case, the police power in particular - gives courts flexibility to respond to evolving social needs.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: billboard, First Amendment, police power, Supreme Court, courts, free speech, property, countermajoritarian, Friedman, Klarman, Metromedia, advertising, advertisement

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 28, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Burnett, David, Judging the Aesthetics of Billboards. Journal of Law and Politics, Spring 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=965775

Contact Information

David Burnett (Contact Author)
University of Virginia - School of Law, Alumnus or Degree Candidate Author ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,461
Downloads: 189
Download Rank: 96,377
Footnotes:  336

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds