|
||||
|
||||
Logic for Law Students: How to Think Like a LawyerRuggero J. AldisertUnited States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Stephen ClowneyUniversity of Kentucky - College of Law Jeremy PetersonU.S. Department of Justice 2007 University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 1, 2007 Abstract: Law schools no longer teach logic. In the authors' view this is tragic, given that the fundamental principles of logic continue to undergird the law and guide the thinking of judges. In an effort to reverse the trend, this essay explains the core principles of logic and how they apply in the law school classroom. The manuscript begins by examining the basics of the deductive syllogisms and then turns to inductive generalizations and the uses and abuses of analogies. The authors claim that students who master the basics of logic laid out in this article will be better lawyers and will feel more comfortable when they find themselves presenting arguments to judges and juries.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22 Keywords: Logic, legal education, syllogism, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, reasoning, legal analysis JEL Classification: K4, K49, K19, I21 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 2, 2007 ; Last revised: May 4, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.360 seconds