|
||||
|
||||
The Nondischargeability of Student Loans in Personal Bankruptcy Proceedings: The Search for a Theory
John Pottow University of Michigan Law School U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 75 U of Michigan Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 07-005 Canadian Business Law Journal, Vol. 44, 2006 Abstract: Student loans are not dischargeable in personal bankruptcy proceedings in the United States. Why is that so? The answer to that question has remained largely unexamined in bankruptcy scholarship to date. Doctrinal and empirical pieces have sprouted up here and there (some quite good), but theoretical treatment has been sparse. This article seeks to help fill that void. It assembles various defensible theories (some more defensible than others) under which student loans should be treated as nondischargeable debts. It then takes a comparative perspective by looking at how the laws in various jurisdictions square with these theories. The United States rates poorly; its laws tend toward implementation of the least defensible theories and only tangentially embrace the more compelling ones. By contrast, countries such as Australia and New Zealand, which take an income-contingent approach to student debt default, are on the right track.
Keywords: bankruptcy, nondischargeability, loan JEL Classifications: H81 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 06, 2007 ; Last revised: July 02, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.172 seconds.