Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=967637
 
 

References (89)



 


 



Comparison of Parametric, Semi-Parametric and Non-Parametric Methods in Bankruptcy Prediction


Arjana Brezigar Masten


Institute for Macroeconomic Analysis and Development

Igor Masten


University of Ljubljana - Faculty of Economics

March 1, 2007


Abstract:     
This paper compares parametric, semi-parametric and non-parametric methods in prediction of bankruptcy. Special care is devoted to the effect of choice-based sampling. The choice of the sampling and estimation method lead to a similar trade off. Using choice-based sampling and logit model leads to minimization of risk exposure. Samples unbalanced across groups and Klein and Spady (1993) semi-parametric method allow for better overall prediction accuracy and thus profit maximization. Both the choice of sampling method and the choice of estimation method should be thus made conditional on an explicit objective function of the financial institution in assesing credit risk.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: bankruptcy prediction, semi-parametric methods, CART

JEL Classification: G32, G33, C14, C25

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 2, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Brezigar Masten, Arjana and Masten, Igor, Comparison of Parametric, Semi-Parametric and Non-Parametric Methods in Bankruptcy Prediction (March 1, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=967637 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.967637

Contact Information

Arjana Brezigar Masten (Contact Author)
Institute for Macroeconomic Analysis and Development ( email )
Gregorciceva 27
Ljubljana
Slovenia
Igor Masten
University of Ljubljana - Faculty of Economics ( email )
Kardeljeva ploscad 17
Ljubljana, 1000
Slovenia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,710
Downloads: 353
Download Rank: 47,309
References:  89

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds