Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=967727
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (362)



 


 



Advancing to Corporate Tax Integration: A Laissez Faire Approach


Anthony P. Polito


Suffolk University Law School


South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 55, p. 1, 2003

Abstract:     
The classical double taxation system applicable to corporations has been flawed for decades. It has introduced serious allocative distortions into the economy. Its effect on the distributive justice of the tax burden is most charitably described as uncertain but might also be described as arbitrary and capricious.

In an idealized income tax regime, individual participants of various business enterprises would bear tax liability without regard to the form of those business enterprises. As a practical matter, however, the idealized alternative to the double tax system - an integrated income tax - is not attainable. Conventional wisdom has always held that anything approaching the integrationist ideal would entail prohibitive administrative burdens, and its comprehensive adoption by a sweeping piece of legislation is politically unlikely even under the best of circumstances. Even the George W. Bush Administration, which originally proposed a very far reaching tax integration scheme, settled for no more than partial temporary dividend relief. Moreover, even that mitigation is scheduled to expire at the end of 2008.

At the same time that the double tax regime seems unlikely to yield to a single comprehensive solution, it is leaky, and increasingly so. Taxpayers avail themselves of a plethora of opportunities to avoid double taxation. Policy makers have created some of those opportunities quite intentionally, others arise out of the exploitation of the unavoidable interstices that exist in the tax law as much as in any other area of law. The existence of these leaks has, at least in the past, led the Treasury and Congress to attempt to minimize the taxpayer-driven evisceration of the double tax regime. That effort has produced legal complexity and administrative burdens for both tax collectors and taxpayers.

The Laissez Faire Approach proposes an alternative that accepts the flawed nature of all tax systems and attempts to use taxpayers' native desire to escape double taxation to good use. There are numerous points in the existing tax regime in which taxpayers' successful attempts to avoid taxation would have the effect of mitigating or nearly eliminating the excess tax burden of the double tax regime. In as much as taxpayers seek to avoid double taxation, the Laissez Faire Approach counsels acquiescence and even affirmative steps to facilitate that self-help mitigation of the excess burden of double taxation. The Laissez Faire Approach seeks further to advance the integrationist ideal, building on the Bush Administration's recent partial success, without incurring the burden of actively pursuing that unattainable ideal. At the same time, it spares the tax system of the administrative cost generated by defending the integrity of a double tax regime that ought in any case to be eliminated.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 71

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 7, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Polito, Anthony P., Advancing to Corporate Tax Integration: A Laissez Faire Approach. South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 55, p. 1, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=967727

Contact Information

Anthony P. Polito (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States
617-573-8518 (Phone)
617-573-8143 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,035
Downloads: 112
Download Rank: 147,025
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  362

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds