Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=968074
 
 

Footnotes (193)



 


 



Environmental Ethics and Cost-Benefit Analysis


Stephen Clowney


University of Arkansas - School of Law


Fordham Environmental Law Review, Vol. 18, p. 105, 2007

Abstract:     
A heated debate has emerged among legal academics over the continued appropriateness of using cost-benefit analysis (CBA) as a decisionmaking tool in federal administrative agencies. Environmentalists and other progressive thinkers argue that regulators should abandon CBA in favor of more holistic procedures. In response, this manuscript provides three original defenses of cost-benefit analysis and hopes to show that CBA advances basic tenets of the environmental movement. Specifically, this Note argues that cost-benefit analysis 1) promotes thoughtful deliberation, 2) protects the dignity of those in contested policy debates, and, 3) improves the standing of environmental groups in the eyes of the public.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: cost-benefit analysis, environmental law

JEL Classification: K32, K23

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 13, 2007 ; Last revised: June 28, 2014

Suggested Citation

Clowney, Stephen, Environmental Ethics and Cost-Benefit Analysis. Fordham Environmental Law Review, Vol. 18, p. 105, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=968074

Contact Information

Stephen Clowney (Contact Author)
University of Arkansas - School of Law ( email )
260 Waterman Hall
Fayetteville, AR 72701
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,006
Downloads: 502
Download Rank: 30,798
Footnotes:  193

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds